Militarization of the U.S.-Mexico border

Beginning in 2014, Elbit Systems, operating under its subsidiary Elbit Systems of America, has been working to increase the militarization of the U.S.-Mexico border. ^[1] Elbit's technology in the area included tools of widespread state surveillance: 55 fixed surveillance towers with a surveillance radius of 7.5 miles each, modular mobile surveillance systems, and tunnel threat systems. ^{[2] [3]} These highly militarized technologies have contributed to a 'funnel effect', ^[4] pushing migrating humans into rougher, more dangerous paths, where they are more likely to die of exposure to extreme environmental conditions such as extreme heat leading to stroke or dehydration.

Effects of increased surveillance

In the period from 2017 to 2022 (the last year in which the U.S. government has reported these statistics, despite having a legal requirement to report yearly), the number of reported deaths of migrating persons on the U.S.-Mexico border increased from 281 to 895. ^[5]

These surveillance technologies have not only been used at borders but also to repress dissent from those Elbit Systems views as a threat. In 2017, these systems were used over a period of eight months to monitor citizens due to the "emerging threat of demonstrations". ^[6]

The end goal of these technologies is not only border surveillance, but a broader surveillance state. Logos Technologies, another U.S. subsidiary of Elbit, touts its 'pioneering' of wide area motion imagery, "which employs medium-resolution cameras to monitor activity across a city-sized area". ^[7]

Repressive architecture of borders

The integration of surveillance technologies supplied by corporations like Elbit Systems into U.S. border infrastructure reveals active instruments of targeted repression with demonstrable human rights consequences. The militarization of the border, through physical barriers, surveillance, and armed patrols, directly harms Indigenous communities whose ancestral lands are bisected by the boundary, endangers the lives of migrating persons, and suppresses dissent. This evidence suggests that the transfer of such technology facilitates human rights abuses and demands greater accountability and transparency from both corporations and the governments that contract them. ^[8]